UDC 339.9
DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.11.01.008
Authors
Dmitry V. Gordienko,
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The article substantiates the possibility of using indicators and criteria for assessing the implementation
of the policy of intervention in the internal affairs of the state.
The political guidelines of the Washington NATO summit determine the possibility of interference by
NATO member states in the internal affairs of Russia, China, Belarus and other countries of the world. At the
same time, NATO member states already use an extensive toolkit for interfering in the internal political affairs
of foreign states. This makes it relevant to develop a Methodology for Assessing the Effectiveness of the Implementation
of the Policy of Intervention in the Internal Affairs of a State.
The indicators of the implementation of the policy of intervention in the internal affairs of a state may be:
restrictions on its independence (sovereignty); restrictions on freedom; inhibition of normal political development;
inhibition of normal economic development; inhibition of normal social development; as well as inhibition
of the normal cultural development of this state.
The criteria for assessing the implementation of the policy of intervention in the internal affairs of a state
may include rules for assessing the values of such indicators in accordance with the implemented restrictions
of its independence (sovereignty) and freedom; as well as inhibition of its normal political, economic, social
and cultural development.
Keywords
intervention in internal affairs, sovereignty, political, economic, social and cultural development, People's Republic of China, USA, Taiwan.
