UDC 57-2
DOI: 10.36871/2618-9976.2023.10.009
Authors
Zinaida I. Abdulaeva,
PhD in Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, NorthWestern
State Medical University
named after I.I. Mechnikov, SaintPetersburg,
Russia
Abstract
Problem context. The existing 4x6 matrix model for evaluating the
effectiveness, sustainability, risks, and opportunities of economic
systems requires modification in the following directions: a) more
detailed consideration of stakeholder interests; b) differentiation
of model factors into "cardinal" and "basement" factors, with a simultaneous
limitation of the maximum number of factors on individual
strategic maps and within the model as a whole.
Research objective. A modified 7x6 matrix model is proposed,
and its functioning is illustrated by a calculation example.
Research methodology. In the 7x6 matrix model, the organization
model as a cybernetic system is replaced by a supersystem
model
consisting of key subsystems: a) impact subsystem, b) economic
subsystem, c) decision subsystems. From the model's perspective,
the supersystem
remains a cybernetic system with feedback loops,
seeking homeostasis (stable equilibrium). Risks and opportunities
in the model act as triggers that initiate or postpone the adoption
of antirisk
and proopportunity
decisions, respectively.
Results. A calculation case is constructed in which market contraction,
forecasted in a triangularfuzzy
form, serves as an adverse
effect (AE). An antirisk
decision is synthesized, and its low
effectiveness is demonstrated, along with proposed adjustments.
Conclusion. The modified 7x6 matrix allows researchers to model
the organization's relationships with its key stakeholders, implementing
a valuesbased
management paradigm instead of the
traditional goalbased
approach.
Keywords
Super-system, Adverse effect (AE), Favorable impact, XNUMXxXNUMX matrix, Normalized balanced scorecard (NBC), Return on equity (ROE), Risk, Opportunity
