UDC 323.3

Authors

Toktobolotova Salima Abdyldaevna,
Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Process and Mediation of the International University named after Kantoro Sharipovich Toktomamatov, Jalal-Abad, Kyrgyzstan
Sarieva Eliza Iskandarovna,
Postgraduate student of the International University named after Kantoro Sharipovich Toktomamatov, Jalal-Abad, Kyrgyzstan

Abstract

Today it is absolutely clear that the monocentric, administrative- prikaz system of power and control inherited from the Soviet system only slows down the necessary transformations, primarily economic reform. The fact is that the political mechanism that is still in force, although clearly outdated, feeds bureaucracy and other social deformations, contributes to the reproduction of the old type of managers and managed, the preservation of passivity and lack of initiative by a large part of the population. This old system is increasingly at odds with the ideas and values of a market economy and discredits the very ideology of the reform. Thus, the conclusion suggests itself about the need for a deep reform of our political system, all its elements, connections, relations and methods of functioning. Experience has shown that this reform should be neither private – in this case it will not give anything, but only discredits itself – nor half-hearted, because then it will lead to slippage, and then to a rollback, and possibly to a counter-reform. Democratic transformations of the second half of the 80s – early 90s determined the development of pre-existing and the development of new institutions of public participation.

Keywords

mechanism, policy, system, power, state, idea, reform, expenses, values, epoch.