УДК 338.1
DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.11.01.012

Авторы

Ильмир Вилович Нусратуллин,
Институт социально-экономических исследований Уфимского федерального исследовательского центра Российской академии наук, Уфа, Россия

Аннотация

Целью исследования является выявление и систематизация ключевых современных трендов устойчивого развития территорий, проведение анализа их взаимосвязи и формулировка основных вызовов для системы управления развитием территории. В ходе исследования использовались следующие методы: системный анализ, библиометрический анализ научной литературы, анализ лучших практик и стратегических нормативно-правовых документов. В результате исследования определена структура трендов по трем компонентам устойчивости (экология, экономика, социальная сфера), выявлен переход от точечных решений к интеграционным, обозначены ключевые проблемы реализации программ устойчивого развития.

Ключевые слова

устойчивое развитие территорий, ESG-трансформация, циркулярная экономика

Список литературы

  1. Amel-Zadeh A., Serafeim G. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey // Financial Analysts Journal. – 2018. – Vol. 74, No. 3. – P. 87–103. – DOI 10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2.
  2. Bibri S. E. The eco-city and its core environmental dimension of sustainability: green energy technologies and their integration with data-driven smart solutions // Energy Informatics. – 2020. – Vol. 3. – Art. 4. – DOI 10.1186/ s42162-020-00107-7.
  3. Biermann F., Kanie N., Kim R. E. Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals // Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. – 2017. – Vol. 26–27. – P. 26–31. – DOI 10.1016/j. cosust.2017.01.010.
  4. Castán Broto V., Westman L. K. Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas // Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. – 2020. – Vol. 11, No. 4. – Art. e643. – DOI 10.1002/wcc.643.
  5. Cohen-Shacham E., Janzen C., Maginnis S., Walters G. (eds.). Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. – IUCN, 2016. – DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en.
  6. Eccles R. G., Klimenko S. The investor revolution // Harvard Business Review Digital Article. – 2019. – URL: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/ product/R1903G-PDF-ENG.
  7. Fünfgeld H. Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks // Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. – 2015. – Vol. 12. – P. 67–73. – DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.011.
  8. Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N. M. P., Hultink E. J. The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2017. – Vol. 143. – P. 757–768. – DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
  9. Hale T., Held D. Beyond Gridlock. – Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2017. – URL: https:// www.wiley.com/en-us/Beyond+Grid — lock-p-9781509515721.
  10. Hsu A., Tan J., Ng Y. M., Toh W., Vanda R., Goyal N. Performance determinants show European cities are delivering on climate mitigation // NatureClimateChange. – 2020. – Vol. 10. – P. 1015– 1022. – DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0879-9.
  11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. – Cambridge University Press, 2023. – DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.
  12. Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions // Resources, Conservation and Recycling. – 2017. – Vol. 127. – P. 221–232. – DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
  13. Kylili A., Fokaides P. A. Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review // Sustainable Cities and Society. – 2017. – Vol. 35. – P. 280–288. – DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013.
  14. Municipality of Amsterdam. Circular strategy 2020–2025. – 2020. – URL: https://www.amsterdam.nl/en/policy/sustainability/circular-economy/.
  15. Reckien D., Creutzig F., Fernandez B., Lwasa S., Tovar-Restrepo M., McEvoy D., Satterthwaite D. Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: An urban perspective // Environment and Urbanization. – 2017. – Vol. 29, No. 1. – P. 159–182. – DOI 10.1177/0956247816677778.
  16. Satterthwaite D. The Political Underpinnings of Cities’ Accumulated Resilience to Climate Change // Environment and Urbanization. – 2013. – Vol. 25, No. 2. – P. 381–391. – DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902.
  17. Seto K. C., Golden J. S., Alberti M., Turner II B. L. Sustainability in an urbanizing planet // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. – 2017. – Vol. 114, No. 34. – P. 8935– 8938. – DOI 10.1073/pnas.1606037114.
  18. Sharifi A., Khavarian-Garmsir A. R. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management // Science of The Total Environment. – 2020. – Vol. 749. – Art. 142391. – DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391.
  19. United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. – 2015. – URL: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
  20. van der Heijden J. Studying urban climate governance: Where to begin, what to look for, and how to make a meaningful contribution to scholarship and practice // Earth System Governance. – 2019. – Vol. 1. – Art. 100005. – DOI 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100005.
  21. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. – Oxford University Press, 1987. – URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.
  22. Yigitcanlar T., Kamruzzaman Md., Foth M., Sabatini-Marques J., da Costa E., Ioppolo G. Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature // Sustainable Cities and Society. – 2019. – Vol. 45. – P. 348–365. – DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033.